From: Vinod Kumar (rigvinod@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 14 2006 - 04:04:31 CST
The original Unicode specification is adequate to handle Chillus. There is
no need to encode the chillus separately. The proposal to encode that was
approved by Unicode some time back should be reconsidered and rejected just
as proposals to encode eye-lash ra for Devanagari was.
Vinod Kumar
Project IndiX
On 2/14/06, Mahesh T. Pai <paivakil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Peter Constable said on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:23:29AM -0800,:
>
> > > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
> > On Behalf
> > > Of N. Ganesan
> >
> >
> > > Any updates on Malayalam Chillus in Unicode?
> > > Was it discussed in the last UTC?
> >
> > There was no significant discussion since we had received a report from
> > the user community in Kerela that parties from both sides of the issue
> > were meeting later this month to discuss this issue and, hopefully,
> > arrive at a consensus.
>
> Strange; I am not aware of such a meeting. Who is organising it?
>
> What is the `user community', according to them?
>
>
> --
> Mahesh T. Pai || http://paivakil.blogspot.com
> ``Those willing to give up a little liberty for a
> little security deserve neither security nor liberty''
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 14 2006 - 04:24:24 CST