Re: Mnemonics for LAO LETTER HO TAM

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2006 - 00:18:48 CDT

  • Next message: Andreas Prilop: "RE: NCR encode/decode, vs Unicode approach"

    On 6/19/2006 5:50 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
    > Kenneth Whistler wrote on Thursday, June 15, 2006 at 2:33 AM
    >
    >>> On perusing the draft 5.0 code charts, I noticed that the mnemonics
    >>> from
    >>> L2/05-357 for U+0EAE LAO LETTER HO TAM have not been included.
    >
    >> Apparently an accidental omission. If you read further
    >> down L2/05-357, to Section 4.3 under Suggested Annotations
    >> and Aliases, you can see that they were omitted in *that*
    >> list, which was the one used to update NamesList.txt for
    >> Unicode 5.0. Easily enough fixed.
    >
    > But they're still missing from Draft 3! Does that mean they must wait
    > until Unicode 5.1?
    I'm happy that you are reviewing draft 3 - but remember, it's just a draft.

    A./
    >
    > Richard.
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 20 2006 - 00:39:24 CDT