RE: Uppercase is coming? (U+1E9E)

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Fri May 04 2007 - 20:38:08 CST

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"

    From: [] On Behalf Of Frank Ellermann

    > They want the as lower case of their fictitious "uppercase ".

    Frank, the "uppercase " is not fictitious: there is a clear evidence of attestation of a distinct typeform. There may be some questions as to the extent of attestation and user community, and certainly some disagreement regarding ontological status as character versus glyph. But trying to win an argument by declaring the typeform in question to be fictitious is not helpful, IMO.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 04 2007 - 20:40:33 CST