From: Marnen Laibow-Koser (email@example.com)
Date: Sat May 05 2007 - 09:42:40 CST
On May 5, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Michael Everson wrote:
>> I bet the Duden thought "Capital ▀" not "Capital special SS
> I bet he didn't like the look of GROSZER and tried to invent something
> better, typesetters are artists.
But standard spelling would be GROSSER, not GROSZER. SZ is only used
in words like MASZE where there's a need for disambiguation.
> IMO the Str÷tzner fonts look nicer
> than the BI Leipzig approximation, but SZlig is still no new
How is it no new character? You've seen it with your own eyes. It's
not an SS ligature. It's not really a SZ ligature. It's not a
lowercase ▀. What else could it be?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 05 2007 - 09:44:09 CST