From: Petr Tomasek (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 23:32:18 CDT
> I suspect, and indeed hope, that you are right. But this is why I consider
> the proposed uppercase eszett a 'half-begotten' character. The proposal is
> explicit that the standard orthographic casing for ß is SS, and the new
> character is proposed on the understanding that it will not interfere with
> existing implementations of that standard casing.
It's pitty, that one cannot change the existing standard.
Otherwise it would seem to me a clean solution to ha
"lowecase" ß and "uppercase" ß and the font designed
should decide, how the "uppercase ß" would be rendered:
> John Hudson
-- Petr Tomasek <http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 07 2007 - 23:36:09 CDT