From: Mark Davis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat May 26 2007 - 19:48:57 CDT
This was brought up in the UTC meeting, and will be fixed (the word and
sentence break use some property values from grapheme cluster breaks).
On 5/14/07, Mike <email@example.com> wrote:
> Both the word boundary and sentence boundary rules
> use an "Extend" class in their definition; however,
> no Extend class is defined for either. There is an
> Extend class defined for grapheme cluster breaks --
> is this the class being referred to? I would think
> that each specification should define their own, or
> at least state where it comes from.
> Am I right that Extend is the same for all three
> rule sets? Or is there some other definition of
> Extend for word and sentence breaking?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 26 2007 - 19:53:06 CDT