Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?

• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• Next in thread: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• Reply: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

BTW, if it's any consolation, Joseph Needham attempted to use a new
convention in his _Science and Civilisation in China_ by using
negative year numbers instead of BC/BCE. IIRC this has the side
effect of adding a year 0 and making a one-year difference in all pre-
AD/CE dates. Fortunately, his convention seems not to have caught on
and CLDR is mercifully freed from the need to support it.

=====
John H. Jenkins
[email protected]

• Next message: arno: "Re: Masri Ya'"
• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• Next in thread: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• Reply: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR Usage of Gregorian Calendar Era Terms: BC and AD -- Can we please have "CE" and "BCE" ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 21 2007 - 10:33:45 CST