Re: New Public Review Issue #129: Code Point Labels: Suggested Wording Details

From: Rick McGowan ([email protected])
Date: Wed Oct 15 2008 - 11:19:41 CDT

Next message: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue: #128, Proposed Update UTS #37: Ideographic Variation Database"

Previous message: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue #129: Code Point Labels: Suggested Wording Details"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue #129: Code Point Labels: Suggested Wording Details"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hello again,

It's been brought to my attention that I forgot to fill in the date in
yesterday's announcement. The date should be October 27, 2008. Sorry for
the omission!

Rick

--------

129 Code Point Labels: Suggested Wording Details

The UTC is seeking input on the proposed text to formally define Unicode �
Code Point Labels. Code Point Labels would include unique strings such as �
"<reserved-1FF0>" for code points which have no assigned Unicode character �
and thus no formal Unicode character name. Details are in the background �
document: http://www.unicode.org/review/pr129.html

Next message: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue: #128, Proposed Update UTS #37: Ideographic Variation Database"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue #129: Code Point Labels: Suggested Wording Details"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue #129: Code Point Labels: Suggested Wording Details"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 15 2008 - 11:24:44 CDT