RE: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters

From: Murray Sargent (murrays@exchange.microsoft.com)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2008 - 00:46:24 CST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"

    You're right. I clicked on Karl's png on a new VAIO desktop. After uninstalling Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo V2, the png was displayed using the Windows Photo Gallery, which doesn't require accepting a license.

    Thanks
    Murray

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Asmus Freytag [mailto:asmusf@ix.netcom.com]
    Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 8:23 PM
    To: Murray Sargent
    Cc: Karl Pentzlin; Unicode Mailing List
    Subject: Re: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters

    On 11/15/2008 1:40 PM, Murray Sargent wrote:
    > Is there any reason that viewing your Orok.png file requires accepting a license agreement?
    >
    >

    Murray,

    about the only thing I can suggest is that you have a viewer for PNG
    files pre-configured that requires such a step. I was viewing the mail
    attachment both with T-Bird and Windows Picture and Fax viewer on XP and
    no such thing was required.

    A.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 16 2008 - 00:50:35 CST