Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: David Starner (prosfilaes@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 03 2009 - 07:53:20 CST

  • Next message: David Starner: "Re: PUA convention ID tags (was: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy)"

    On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Ruszlan Gaszanov <ruszlan@ather.net> wrote:
    > I wonder if anyone would actually use emoji in their search queries. There are many other PUA applications (e.g. ConScript, MUFI, TUNE etc.) that people *might* actually want to use in search queries, yet UTC does not seems to care very much about that.

    How can you claim that? Everything in TUNE is already in Unicode, and
    proposals for significant parts of both MUFI and ConScript (Shavian,
    Deseret) have already been encoded.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 03 2009 - 07:55:55 CST