Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Sun Jan 11 2009 - 18:41:24 CST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

Previous message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: UTF-8 and string manipulations in Java"
In reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:16 PM, David Starner <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Leo Broukhis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> What if we're talking about a language with a nascent writing system
>> (less than 10 y.o.) for which there are only 3 abecedaries so far?
>
> We don't encode stuff that's only been used in 3 books.

Oh, yes, we do. And less.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Previous message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: UTF-8 and string manipulations in Java"
In reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 11 2009 - 18:43:00 CST