Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 11:55:46 CST

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Emoji-- all or nothing?"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 12 Jan 2009, at 17:53, Peter Constable wrote:

> That's for JPGs and GIFs in html, not emoji encoded as characters.

Yeah, till some cute and "useful" ones become popular.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Emoji-- all or nothing?"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 12 2009 - 11:57:13 CST