Re: What can be encoded in 2011? (from Re: On the possibility of encoding webdings in Unicode)

From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (asmodai@in-nomine.org)
Date: Fri Jan 28 2011 - 02:52:16 CST

  • Next message: William_J_G Overington: "Re: What can be encoded in 2011? (from Re: On the possibility of encoding webdings in Unicode)"

    -On [20110128 09:13], William_J_G Overington (wjgo_10009@btinternet.com) wrote:
    >I have made no demands at all.

    I might have missed something, but you are constantly asking for non-PUA
    codepoints for your "proposal" in order to have it successfully implemented.
    That's a demand.

    And in my opinion quite unrealistic, given the amount of time and paperwork
    people who are working on existing historical and current orthographies have
    to put in and go through to get something encoded. 

    -- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Rome was not built in a day...

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 28 2011 - 02:54:33 CST