Re: Code pages and Unicode

From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:21:20 +0530

On 08/22/2011 03:05 PM, Andrew West wrote:
> Can anyone think of a way to extend UTF-16 without adding new
> surrogates or inventing a new general category?

Why would anyone *need* to do so? UTF-16 can represent all codepoints
upto Plane 16 right?

-- 
Shriramana Sharma

Received on Mon Aug 22 2011 - 06:56:10 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Shriramana Sharma: "Re: RTL PUA?"
Previous message: Andrew West: "Re: Code pages and Unicode"
In reply to: Andrew West: "Re: Code pages and Unicode"
Next in thread: Andrew West: "Re: Code pages and Unicode"
Reply: Andrew West: "Re: Code pages and Unicode"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 22 2011 - 06:56:11 CDT