On 8/21/2011 3:31 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
> I expect ARABIC LANGUAGE MARK would not go down well
> - has it already been proposed and rejected?.
ARABIC *LETTER* MARK, not *LANGUAGE* mark. (And suggested
to just be renamed to "AL MARK".)
Proposed? Yes.
Discussed? Yes.
Rejected? No.
The last UTC meeting took a consensus to issue a public review
issue on the proposed ALM and ELM (embedding level mark)
characters. So there will be further discussion and chance for input.
Nothing has been decided yet.
--Ken
Received on Mon Aug 22 2011 - 16:12:22 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 22 2011 - 16:12:23 CDT