RE: Is the "Subject" field of an e-mail an obvious example of "plain text" where no higher level protocol application is possible?

From: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele_at_microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:36:09 +0000

A) it can use quoted-printable
B) See RFC 6532/6530 - Now it can be UTF-8 :)

-Shawn
Received on Fri Jul 20 2012 - 12:38:55 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Davis ☕: "Unicode String Models"
Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Is the "Subject" field of an e-mail an obvious example of "plain text" where no higher level protocol application is possible?"
Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Is the "Subject" field of an e-mail an obvious example of "plain text" where no higher level protocol application is possible?"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Is the "Subject" field of an e-mail an obvious example of "plain text" where no higher level protocol application is possible?"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Is the "Subject" field of an e-mail an obvious example of "plain text" where no higher level protocol application is possible?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 20 2012 - 12:38:55 CDT