Re: COMBINING OVER MARK?

From: Frédéric Grosshans <frederic.grosshans_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:20:02 +0200

Le 01/10/2013 02:51, Leo Broukhis a écrit :
>
> Hi All,
>
> Attached is a part of page 36 of Henry Alford's */The Queen's English:
> a manual of idiom and usage/ (1888)*
> [http://archive.org/details/queensenglishman00alfo]
>
> Is the way to indicate alternative s/z spellings used there plain text
> (arguably, if it can be done with a typewriter, it is plain text) or
> rich text (ignoring the font size of letters s and z)?
U+xxxx LATIN SUBSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER Z U+1DE4 COMBINING LATIN SMALL
LETTER S, but LATIN SUBSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER Z doesn't exist.
Interestingly, the opposite combination, U+209B LATIN SUBSCRIPT SMALL
LETTER S ‍ U+1DE6 COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER Z exists.
Received on Tue Oct 01 2013 - 05:22:15 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 01 2013 - 05:22:16 CDT