Re: Flag tags with U+1F3F3 and subtypes

From: Markus Scherer <markus.icu_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:28:18 -0700

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:

> Is the new mechanism intended to allow flag tags that include either
> "subtype" values or "contains" values?

As far as I can tell from your quotes, CLDR will say what's valid (plus
containment info), and Unicode permits you to show a flag for any valid tag.
North Lanarkshire seems perfectly fine.

I am curious to see if the redundant hyphen will be part of the syntax.

markus
Received on Mon May 18 2015 - 13:29:25 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 18 2015 - 13:29:25 CDT