Re: Representing Additional Types of Flags

From: Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:07:34 -0700

Also posted as formal feedback to the PRI:

6. What is the policy on generating flag tags with unicode_region_subtag
values corresponding to private-use BCP 47 subtags, other than those
given special semantics by CLDR? Are they invalid or merely discouraged?
Should tools allow users to create such a tag? Is there any provision
for a "private agreement," similar to that defined in Unicode for PUA
usage?

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
Received on Thu Jul 02 2015 - 10:08:31 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 02 2015 - 10:08:31 CDT