On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 16:57:15 -0700
"Asmus Freytag (t)" <asmus-inc_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On 10/4/2015 4:14 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
> respect to what to erase or undo.
>>> For sequences that belong to a given language, you can pick the
>>> behavior that makes most sense in them, but for lone surrogates, by
>>> definition you are dealing with broken text that doesn't follow any
>>> conventions.
>> Who's 'you'? Customisation is frequently not available. In fact, I
>> don't recall seeing it on offer.
> The UI developer.
> And there's nothing Unicode can do about lack of customizability.
Actually, there is. I believe suggestions and recommendations in the
technical reports are quite influential.
Richard.
Received on Sun Oct 04 2015 - 19:30:14 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2015 - 19:30:14 CDT