On 10/6/2016 12:44 PM, Garth Wallace wrote:
> Some representatives of the WFCC have proposed alternate arrangements
> that assume there will be a need for bitwise operations to covert
> between the existing chess symbols in the Miscellaneous Symbols block
> and related symbols in the new block. I don't see the need but maybe
> I'm missing something.
I don't think you are missing anything. Bitwise operations would
certainly *not* be needed in a case like this. Small lookup and mapping
tables would suffice.
--Ken
Received on Thu Oct 06 2016 - 16:28:56 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 06 2016 - 16:28:56 CDT