Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?

From: Hans Åberg <haberg-1_at_telia.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:03:42 +0200

> On 10 Oct 2016, at 21:42, Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> I think that IPA might be designed for broad phonetic transcriptions
>> [1], with a requirement to distinguish phonemes within each given
>> language.
>
> From the Wikipedia article you cited:
>
> "For example, one particular pronunciation of the English word little
> may be transcribed using the IPA as /ˈlɪtəl/ or [ˈlɪɾɫ̩]; the
> broad, phonemic transcription, placed between slashes, indicates merely
> that the word ends with phoneme /l/, but the narrow, allophonic
> transcription, placed between square brackets, indicates that this final
> /l/ ([ɫ]) is dark (velarized)."
>
> IPA can be used pretty much as broadly or as narrowly as one wishes.

Within each language, but is not designed to capture differences between different languages or dialects.
Received on Mon Oct 10 2016 - 15:04:05 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 10 2016 - 15:04:05 CDT