On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:00:18 +1100
Harshula via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> When a font is missing a glyph during an *explicit* conjunct lookup,
> it appears the most accurate solution is to display the missing glyph
> symbol.
However, I don't believe that that is the most useful solution, and it
certainly isn't when composing 'plain text'. Now, if one is composing
the font that will be used to read the text as one writes the text, it
may have some benefit; it may also have some benefit if one can select
the font that will be used, and a suitable font is available.
Richard.
Received on Tue Oct 16 2018 - 19:04:48 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 16 2018 - 19:04:49 CDT