Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

From: Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 21:15:35 -0500

Just to add some more fuel for this fire, I note also the highly popular
(in some places) technique of using Unicode letters that may have
nothing whatsoever to do with the symbol or letter you mean to
represent, apart from coincidental resemblance and looking "cool"
enough.  This happens a lot on Second Life, where you can set your
"display name" distinct from your "user name", but the display name
appears to be limited to Unicode *letters* and some punctuation, mostly,
and certainly can't be outside the BMP.  So for a sampling from stuff
I've heard of...

ΑbiΑИØ SŦээlSØul
ΛPΉӨD
ΛИƓĿƐĪƇ  Ɗє ℓα ℜudǝ ωђitmαη
ΛЯℂӨƧ BΛПDΣЯΛƧ
ღLɪɴᴅᴀღ
ђÅℵℵƔ Fashionablez ℬãŋќş Ķhaгg
єσηα MιяєƖуηη
ℒυςノσυʂ ツ .
乙u 乙u
尺αмση ℓυιѕ αуαℓα
mღn
ᄊムレo
Ɩ'M ŦЯØЦßĿЄ ƧЄƝƖȤЄƝ ƓƠƬƊƛMMƖƬ™
øקςøги вαℓℓѕ ßⱥţţïţuđє
Ąşђεгöη ĄĶЯĨ Ğrєץ
Đ尺ѦႺΘȠ
đ σ  ℜ ι ค ℵ :.
ĦΔZΔRĐ
ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ
ϮJΩƧӇƲΔϮ
ϯcH ℭℛℯȡĩȵŧă
ⓁợⒼαℵ
亗 Amy 亗
ßяуⒶℵ GяєуωσLƒ
тαקקαt Wuηđǝяレǝ
کhäşhι ℰղcαηϯäɖσƦ
ۣღۣۜ Jarah Sparksۣღۣۜ
ઇઉ fleur ઇઉ
໓яαкє ςнυяςн
ڰۣღ- Pandora Barbarosڰۣღ-
ஐ tenayah ஐ-x-
ღⒹムяк 丂σuℓ™ღ
ץlđє Ͼђץlɠє
Լסяє ℳססɗү
עΨ Gatatem ђαвίв Ψיע

I could do more searching... Some of these things are even more common
than shown here.  Using ღ for a heart ♡ is extremely widespread, and
decorations like 亗 and Ϯ abound.  Note some decorations involving ღ with
some Arabic(!) combining characters. Note the use of Hebrew and Arabic
and CJK and other characters to represent Latin letters to which they
bear only a passing resemblance.  There are also a lot of names in all
small-caps or all full-width (I didn't include any examples of just that
because they seemed so ordinary), or "inverted"  ·uoı̣ɥsɐɟ ꞁɐnsn əɥʇ uı̣

I don't know what, precisely, this argues for or against.  Would people
deny that this is an "abuse" of the character-set, even though people
are doing it and it works for them?  The medium is pretty indisputably
plain-text.  Should all this kind of thing be somehow made to "work" for
these creative, if mystifying, people? These are clearly pretty far-out
examples (though not extreme, compared to what's out there, nor
uncommon, from what I have been told.)

This discussion has been very interesting, really.  I've heard what I
thought were very good points and relevant arguments from both/all
sides, and I confess to not being sure which I actually prefer.  Just
giving you more to think about...

~mark
Received on Sat Jan 12 2019 - 20:15:56 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 12 2019 - 20:15:56 CST