Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing link)

From: James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:55:34 +0000

On 2019-01-20 10:49 PM, Garth Wallace wrote:
> I think the real solution is for Twitter to just implement basic
> styling and make this a moot point.

At which time it would only become a moot point for Twitter users.
There's also Facebook and other on-line groups. Plus scholars and
linguists. And interoperability.
Received on Sun Jan 20 2019 - 16:55:52 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode: "Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing link)"
Previous message: Garth Wallace via Unicode: "Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing link)"
In reply to: Garth Wallace via Unicode: "Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing link)"
Next in thread: David Starner via Unicode: "Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing link)"
Reply: David Starner via Unicode: "Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing link)"
Reply: Asmus Freytag via Unicode: "Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing link)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 20 2019 - 16:55:52 CST