This page is a compilation of formal public feedback received so far. See Feedback for further information on this issue, how to discuss it, and how to provide feedback.
Date/Time: Tue Oct 21 01:01:22 PT 2025
ReportID: ID20251021010122
Name: Eiso Chan
Report Type: Report Error in Publication/Data
Opt Subject: UTC-00733
The current information is below. UTC-00733;Variant;U+81A5;130.11;;⿰未⿱成肉;kCheungBauerIndex 453.09;;; But, this one should be mapped to U+31F1A 𱼚 in CJK Ext. H.
Date/Time: Wed Nov 12 19:50:42 PT 2025
ReportID: ID20251112195042
Name: Eiso Chan
Report Type: Report Error in Publication/Data
Opt Subject: G-Source references for U+3A36 㨶 and U+6440 摀
As what I wrote for WS2024-01574 on the IRG WS2024 ORT (https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2024/app/?id=01574). I suggest update the G-Source references as below and the G glyphs should be kept as-is. U+3A36 kIRG_GSource GKX-0450.19 U+6440 kIRG_GSource G5-4B63 The kGB5 property value under U+3A36 㨶 should be removed and move the corresponding value to U+6440 摀 U+6440 kGB5 4367
Date/Time: Wed Nov 19 09:31:17 PT 2025
ReportID: ID20251119093117
Name: Ken Lunde
Report Type: Report Error in Publication/Data
Opt Subject: kTotalStrokes property value changes
The informative kTotalStrokes property values of the following two ideographs, which are also used as components of other ideographs, should be changed as follows to conform to IRG stroke-counting conventions: U+4E9F kTotalStrokes 9 (currently 8) U+268DE kTotalStrokes 7 (currently 6)
Date/Time: Tue Dec 09 08:59:46 PT 2025
ReportID: ID20251209085946
Name: Ken Lunde
Report Type: PRI Feedback
Opt Subject: PRI 534
I received a report that five kMandarin property values in the Extension I block that were added in Unicode Version 17.0 are incorrect, which I was able to trace to a one-off error on pp 2 and 3 of document L2/25-029 in which the CLDR-TC responded to proposed kMandarin property values in document L2/23-209. What caused this issue is that the code point in the referenced URL in the eighth (and final) column is one higher than the code point in the first column, and the glyph in the second column is for the character that is one code point higher than that in the first column. The CLDR-TC confirmed the errors and the following corrections on 2025-12-08: U+2EC3D kMandarin yuè (currently lǎn) U+2EC3E kMandarin lǎn (currently qiè) U+2EC3F kMandarin qiè (currently xíng) U+2EC41 kMandarin jìn (currently yǔ) U+2EC52 kMandarin niǎo (currently yàn)
Date/Time: Tue Dec 23 12:52:37 PT 2025
ReportID: ID20251223125237
Name: Llinos Evans
Report Type: PRI Feedback
Opt Subject: kTang information
The data in kTang does not seem sufficient; The Tang dynasty pronunciation(s) of this ideograph, derived from or consistent with T’ang Poetic Vocabulary by Hugh M. Stimson, Far Eastern Publications, Yale University 1976. An asterisk indicates that the word or morpheme represented in toto or in part by the given ideograph with the given reading occurs more than four times in the seven hundred poems covered. Specifically, it does not denote where the pronunciations come from in that text. Are they Pulleyblank/Karlgren/etc reconstructions? Is it based on the Qieyun, Guangyun, etc? It would be extremely handy if this were noted if only to make it a little more comprehensive, otherwise it isn't very useful to an outsider like myself. I did try to track down the book but the only listing I could find is £100 and it isn't on any shadow libraries. Mind lending a hand?