Timothy Huang said:
> For example, when the Unicode 1.0 draft was released, the character
> sequence was just mathematical union of four local standards.
and further:
> Please look at the Unicode draft by Joe Backer and Lee Collins, way back
> in October 1989 or earlier, you will know what I mean "mathematic
> union". It is a well known fact printed black on white. I think the
Just as a matter of record, I feel compelled to point out that anything which
could be called a "Unicode 1.0 draft" dates from December 1990. Any 1989
paper to which Mr. Huang refers would have been an early working paper or
pre-1.0-draft in limited circulation, not an official document of the Unicode
Consortium. Glenn Adams formulation is correct, viz:
> Unicode's arrangement of CJK Ideographs follows the radical + stroke order
> established by the KangXi ZiDian [...etcetera]
Rick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:31 EDT