Re: Comparison algorithms in UNICODE

From: Keld J|rn Simonsen (
Date: Sat Aug 19 1995 - 08:22:18 EDT

unicode@Unicode.ORG writes:

> I'm glad to see whois++ people endorsing Unicode. There was resistance
> to the idea back during the early whois++ discussions several
> years ago.

I also think it is a good move to go into the big character sets,
but I think that you should call it ISO 10646 or UCS. UNICODE
is in principle a proprietary standard. And encodings like
UTF-8 are not UNICODE, but is 10646 and may well have
a significant role to play in whois++

Keld Simonsen

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:32 EDT