Gavin Nicol writes:
> >I have a distinct recollection that we agreed to remove the String and
> >Character classes in Vancouver, but I can't find any of the
> >String/Character discussion in the minutes. Didn't we decide that this was
> >in Unicode's court, not ours?
I remember we talked about this, but I couldn't find the outcome minuted.
> No, we agreed to make them an appendix. When I was reading the recent
> draft (as with the earlier one), I found many errors in the descriptions.
> I figure we should just drop them, as save the trouble of fixing the
> descriptions.
What do other folks feel about this? Should we a) remove them completely, b)
remove them but leave a note (as I guess we're doing for Selections) that we'll
be adding this functionality into level 1 at a later date (on the assumption
that it's better to not publish something than to publish something with
errors), or c) something else? I'm happy to go whichever way the group
decides, but I'd like to make sure I won't be doing something objectionable to
someone before I do it.
Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:36 EDT