On 20 Nov 98, at 11:10, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> The reason why Michael Everson (?) has jumped the gun on
> this one is that there is a reasonable presumption that
> the DRACHMA SIGN *will* be added at the last minute by WG2
> for the republication of 10646, based on the fact that it
> is being added to the revised ISO 8859-7.
They're *changing* ISO 8859-7 ? In an incompatible way ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:43 EDT