> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Whistler [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 3:40 AM
> To: Unicode List
> Cc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Unicode Standard & ISO-10646 Standard
> Dear Mr. Ricardo Bermell-Benet,
> > żIs it a subset? If so, why don't use ISO-10646 as a better
> (wider) standard.
> > żIs the diference that Unicode supplies algorithms?
From my point of view as a user of Hebrew, the major difference is that
Unicode specifies the bidi algorithm while ISO 10646 does not.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:46 EDT