Re: (Re: Unicode mapping table need help) Euro sign encoding

From: John Cowan (cowan@locke.ccil.org)
Date: Wed Jun 09 1999 - 10:09:30 EDT

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: missing Hebrew point left holam"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Hexadecimal in many scripts (ISO 14755)"
Maybe in reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: (Re: Unicode mapping table need help) Euro sign encoding"
Next in thread: John Jenkins: "Re: (Re: Unicode mapping table need help) Euro sign encoding"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Granted that this is a violation of Unicode conformance.

Not at all. Unicode does not define U+0080, and anyway there is
no reason why multiple Unicode characters can't be rendered with
the same glyph, in fact it's expected in cases like LATIN CAPITAL
A WITH RING ABOVE and ANGSTROM SIGN.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: missing Hebrew point left holam"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Hexadecimal in many scripts (ISO 14755)"
Maybe in reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: (Re: Unicode mapping table need help) Euro sign encoding"
Next in thread: John Jenkins: "Re: (Re: Unicode mapping table need help) Euro sign encoding"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:46 EDT