> Granted that this is a violation of Unicode conformance.
Not at all. Unicode does not define U+0080, and anyway there is
no reason why multiple Unicode characters can't be rendered with
the same glyph, in fact it's expected in cases like LATIN CAPITAL
A WITH RING ABOVE and ANGSTROM SIGN.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan firstname.lastname@example.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:46 EDT