In message <9906100858.AA07488@unicode.org> Markus Kuhn recently said:
> The Unicode bidi standard was not written with VT100 terminal editing
> semantics in mind, and the bidi parts of ISO 6429 are not the most
> readable specification on the planet.
> ISO 6429 = ECMA-48 is freely available from
There is also Technical Report TR/53 available from the ECMA which discusses
some the issues in doing bidi on a 6429 device.
-- Tim Partridge. Any opinions expressed are mine only and not those of my employer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:46 EDT