Re: Unicode in source code. WHY?

From: Torsten Mohrin (mohrin@sharmahd.com)
Date: Wed Jul 21 1999 - 09:13:30 EDT


On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:57:31 -0700 (PDT), Jonathan Rosenne wrote:

>We also know that those environments that do allow the use of Unicode are
>not all compatible. I see two main problems:
>
>1. Should the full Unicode repertoire be allowed, or just a subset?

From the Java docs:

>public static boolean isUnicodeIdentifierStart(char ch)
>
>Determines if the specified character is permissible as the
>first character in a Unicode identifier. A character may start a
>Unicode identifier if and only if it is a letter.

and:

>A character is considered to be a letter if and only if it is
>specified to be a letter by the Unicode 2.0 standard (category "Lu",
>"Ll", "Lt", "Lm", or "Lo" in the Unicode specification data file).

This is far more than one would need for localisation of source code.
A subset would be better.

--
Torsten Mohrin
Sharmahd Computing GmbH, Hannover, Germany
Phone: +49-511-13780, Fax: +49-511-13450
http://www.sharmahd.com, mohrin@sharmahd.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT