>> I think the main problem with having UTF-8 but not UTF-16 (or vice versa)
>> is that one requires greater bandwidth than the other for different classes
>> of writing systems.
Markus Kuhn <Markus.Kuhn@cl.cam.ac.uk>:
MK> Fully negligible.
MK> So the UTF-8 bandwidth overhead is really more of an academic
MK> problem (or worse, a political pretext).
Don't underestimate political and emotional motivations. ``This
Unicode thing is just a European fad, it's really only good for Latin
characters. Let's stick to our lovely locale-specific coded character
sets.'' (Rings a bell, Markus?)
In other words, whatever the advantages of UTF-8, handling, or at
least taking into account, UTF-16 is necessary if you want Unicode to
be adopted by users and implementors in East-Asian countries.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:51 EDT