Re: Chinese bibliographies

From: Akerbeltz Alba (
Date: Mon Aug 23 1999 - 18:11:35 EDT


>Otherwise it seems that people pick whichever method is best given their
>documentation tools. Personally I pick the one that makes the most sense for
>the audience of the paper. Rarely do I use (5). I prefer either (2) or (3).
>If the readership may be a mix of Mandarin and Cantonese speakers, then it
>is good to provide the Han characters in the title.

Or the Cantonese in Romanization which I have also seen if the book was published in Hong Kong. Preferrably Yale Romanization.
For a short (but useful) description of Yale try this site:



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:51 EDT