Re: metalanguage (was RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?)

From: John Cowan ([email protected])
Date: Mon Oct 04 1999 - 12:29:37 EDT

Next message: Herman Ranes: "Schutz-Staffel symbol"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Why is Unicode inconsistant?"
Maybe in reply to: Reynolds, Gregg: "metalanguage (was RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?)"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: metalanguage (was RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Reynolds, Gregg scripsit:

> Has this been done before? Would anybody other than me find this useful?

RFC 1345 would be a good starting point.

-- 
John Cowan                                   [email protected]
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

Next message: Herman Ranes: "Schutz-Staffel symbol"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Why is Unicode inconsistant?"
Maybe in reply to: Reynolds, Gregg: "metalanguage (was RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?)"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: metalanguage (was RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT