Glen Perkins wrote:
> Am I mistaken? Was there a decision made to not unify simplified and
> traditional in any case?
My reading of Unicode 2.0 is that simplified and traditional characters
have different abstract shapes (Y axis), though they have the same
semantic (X axis). Unification is performed only between characters
with the same abstract shape *and* semantic. Therefore, simplified
and traditional characters cannot be properly unified.
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <email@example.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:56 EDT