RE: Latin ligatures and Unicode

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Tue Dec 28 1999 - 19:01:24 EST

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Euro homepage?"
Maybe in reply to: Eberhard Pehlemann: "Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Wac&hstube and Wac&hF&tube
> (where F in the 2nd example is the long s and & is the ZWL.

Wait just a dang minute! If you *encode* this text using a long
s in the second case, then the boundaries and ligatures *are*
predictable, and you can dispense with the ZWL's.

I don't get it.

--Ken

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Euro homepage?"
Maybe in reply to: Eberhard Pehlemann: "Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT