RE: Latin ligatures and Unicode

From: Kenneth Whistler (
Date: Tue Dec 28 1999 - 19:01:24 EST

> Wac&hstube and Wac&hF&tube
> (where F in the 2nd example is the long s and & is the ZWL.

Wait just a dang minute! If you *encode* this text using a long
s in the second case, then the boundaries and ligatures *are*
predictable, and you can dispense with the ZWL's.

I don't get it.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT