Doug Ewell scripsit:
> Just to play devil's advocate, and to improve my understanding...
> What was the motivation then for encoding the block from U+06F0 to
> U+06F9, EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO through NINE? Aren't these
> just Persian glyph variants of U+0660 to U+0669, ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT
> ZERO through NINE?
They have different bidirectional properties.
-- John Cowan firstname.lastname@example.org I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT