Re: Paper on the (misnaming) of the Han

From: John Jenkins ([email protected])
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 16:21:33 EST

Next message: [email protected]: "RE: Transliteration"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Rationale for U+10FFFF?"
In reply to: Tom Emerson: "RE: Paper on the (misnaming) of the Han"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 3/6/00 10:51 AM, Tom Emerson at [email protected] wrote:

> OK then, do *you* know why they are named what they are? I asked Glenn
> Adams, he didn't know. No one seems to know.
>

I haven't been able to find out, either. This is a true mystery.

=====
John H. Jenkins
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng

Next message: [email protected]: "RE: Transliteration"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Rationale for U+10FFFF?"
In reply to: Tom Emerson: "RE: Paper on the (misnaming) of the Han"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT