on 4/8/00 10:34 AM, John Cowan at cowan@locke.ccil.org wrote:
> jon@kanji.com scripsit:
>
>> In Version 3 of the Standard, the 214 Kangxi classifiers
>> have been singled out and given their own new, code points in
>> addition to the ones they already had.
>
> That some of them already had, I think. Some radicals are not zi4.
>
All of them had them. Even though many of them aren't words -- that is,
couldn't be used in a sentence all by themselves -- they all got encoded
anyway.
=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com
tseng@blueneptune.com
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:01 EDT