On Wed, 31 May 2000, Michael Kaplan (Trigeminal Inc.) wrote:
> Well, its slightly different when the very group that is just about
> universally attributed as the original source for the character is the one
> calling it a logo.
copyleft.net are just some random people. I strongly suspect they postdate
the first instance of the copyleft sign.
whether I can find an attestation of this is another matter...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:03 EDT