RE: admits it's a logo

From: Robert Brady (
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 04:37:41 EDT

On Wed, 31 May 2000, Michael Kaplan (Trigeminal Inc.) wrote:

> Well, its slightly different when the very group that is just about
> universally attributed as the original source for the character is the one
> calling it a logo. are just some random people. I strongly suspect they postdate
the first instance of the copyleft sign.

whether I can find an attestation of this is another matter...


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:03 EDT