A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?

From: rampshot@usa.net
Date: Fri Jun 16 2000 - 12:29:53 EDT

Next message: rampshot@usa.net: "Re: [RE: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?]"
Previous message: Séamas Ó Brógáin: "Re: Linguistic precedence [was: (TC304.2313)"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?"
Maybe reply: Otto Stolz: "Re: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Treat Ä (A-umlaut) as a separate letter, between A and B.

____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

Next message: rampshot@usa.net: "Re: [RE: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?]"
Previous message: Séamas Ó Brógáin: "Re: Linguistic precedence [was: (TC304.2313)"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?"
Maybe reply: Otto Stolz: "Re: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:04 EDT