Re: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?
From:
Otto Stolz (
Otto.Stolz@uni-konstanz.de
)
Date:
Fri Jun 16 2000 - 20:59:04 EDT
Next message:
Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: [RE: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?]"
Previous message:
Mark Leisher: "Re: Linguistic precedence [was: (TC304.2313)"
Maybe in reply to:
rampshot@usa.net: "A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Mail actions:
[ respond to this message ]
[ mail a new topic ]
text/plain attachment:
Text
Next message:
Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: [RE: A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?]"
Previous message:
Mark Leisher: "Re: Linguistic precedence [was: (TC304.2313)"
Maybe in reply to:
rampshot@usa.net: "A better method than the German one Otto Stolz gave?"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Mail actions:
[ respond to this message ]
[ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.1.2
:
Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:04 EDT