Re: UTF-8N?

From: John Cowan (
Date: Thu Jun 22 2000 - 14:31:40 EDT

Kenneth Whistler wrote:

> Now we are pushing through the long, bureaucratic process of getting
> this accepted into 10646-1, so it we maintain synchronicity with a
> joint publication of it as a *standard* character.

So a fair statement of what you hope to achieve is: U+2060 will be
the zero-width non-breaking space, or zero-width word joiner depending on
how you look at it, and U+FFFE will be a byte order mark, which MAY
(but SHOULD NOT) be used with the same semantics as U+2060.


Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:04 EDT