Re: Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ...

• Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender:"
• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender: Jens"
• Maybe in reply to: Bob Hallissy: "Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
• Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:

> One thing they do is use the LATEST cp 1256, which includes the Farsi
> characters, so the hacks are not needed.... and then they would not have to
> move to Unicode, actually. I ran across several localizers who were willing
> to produce files in three formats:

Would you please give me a link to the conversion table from the latest
CP1256? The version I saw on the Unicode web site lacks:

U+066B ARABIC DECIMAL SEPARATOR
U+06A9 ARABIC LETTER KEHEH
U+06C0 ARABIC LETTER HEH WITH YEH ABOVE
U+06CC ARABIC LETTER FARSI YEH

which are needed for Persian.

--roozbeh

• Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender:"
• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender: Jens"
• Maybe in reply to: Bob Hallissy: "Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
• Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:05 EDT