Re: Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender:

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Wed Jul 12 2000 - 10:17:22 EDT

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
Previous message: Roozbeh Pournader: "Re: Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
Next in thread: N.R.Liwal: "Re: Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender:"
Maybe reply: N.R.Liwal: "Re: Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@compuserve.com>
> There is already a separate list called "unicore" where members discuss
> proposals for new characters and scripts and other nuts-and-bolts
> issues. (BTW, how can I join that list? Is it for Unicode members
> only?)

Yes, its members only.

michka

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
Previous message: Roozbeh Pournader: "Re: Persian developers (was Re: Detecting installed fonts in ..."
Next in thread: N.R.Liwal: "Re: Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender:"
Maybe reply: N.R.Liwal: "Re: Proposal to make the unicode list more transparent! (Sender:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:05 EDT