That's not true. Even serious UNIX shops start with the perception that
there is only one Unicode and that it is 16-bits (UCS-2). I get this *all*
the time.
Addison
===========================================================
Addison P. Phillips Principal Consultant
Inter-Locale LLC http://www.inter-locale.com
Los Gatos, CA, USA mailto:addison@inter-locale.com
+1 408.210.3569 (mobile) +1 408.904.4762 (fax)
===========================================================
Globalization Engineering & Consulting Services
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
> Although there is some truth here.... the fact is that it is not really true
> today that everyone equates the two. The default thought on people's minds
> these days when they think of Unicode is UTF-8, it seems like. And this is
> mainly due to applications of Unicode to the web, I think.
>
> In the meantime, Microsoft is still pretty firmly rooted in the idea that
> Unicode=USC-2 (or UTF-16le on Windows 2000). UTF-8 is named UTF-8 and
> considered to be a multibyte encoding.
>
> michka
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@compuserve.com>
> To: "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 10:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Unicode in VFAT file system
>
>
> > Addison Phillips <addison@inter-locale.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Avoiding for the moment the word-parsing that Markus suggests, Unicode
> > > on Microsoft platforms has always been LE (at least on Intel) and they
> > > have called the encoding they use "UCS-2" (when they bothered with
> > > such things: in the past they always called it "Unicode" as if it were
> > > the *only* encoding). As Unicode has evolved, Microsoft products have
> > > become more exact in this regard.
> >
> > I remember that in the early to mid '90s, before the invention (or at
> > least widespread use) of UTF-8, UTF-32, and surrogates, *everybody* --
> > not just Microsoft -- used the term "Unicode" to refer to what we would
> > now call UCS-2. Even the Unicode Consortium did this! And even now,
> > the few of my co-workers who know about Unicode (I'm trying to spread
> > the word, folks, honest) think a "Unicode text file" is UCS-2 by
> > definition. I don't know what they would think of a UTF-8 file --
> > nobody but me is knowingly using them yet. In any case, this usage is
> > by no means confined to Microsoft.
> >
> > -Doug Ewell
> > Fullerton, California
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT