RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?

From: Jeff Hay-Roe (jeff@sqwest.bc.ca)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 17:02:31 EDT

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Unicode site"
Previous message: George Zeigler: "Entering data in unicode"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Next in thread: Chris Pratley: "RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Chris Pratley wrote:
>Surrogate support was not turned on by default in Win2000 because the
>Windows team was waiting for the standard to be finalized. It was also added
>late, so to reduce the potential impact they had it off - a safe bet since
>the standard was still 1+ years from completion.

How do you turn *ON* surrogate support in Win2K?
(Please pardon me if it is blatantly obvious; I'm not running Win2000.)

Jeff Hay-Roe
Sechelt, B.C.
Canada

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Unicode site"
Previous message: George Zeigler: "Entering data in unicode"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Next in thread: Chris Pratley: "RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:14 EDT